Conclusion: Major Lacunae and Emerging Themes
These points are not presented in order of importance, but in
the order in which they have emerged in reviewing this chapter to
date. The unifying focus of these themes is the issue of
immigrant integration, rather than the international factors
which will help determine the levels of immigration into Canada.
1. The reviews suggest an absence of research focused on the
urban setting and immigrant integration in Canada. While many
studies obviously focus on immigrants living within Canadian
cities, there is little specific linkage made to the intersection
of uniquely urban conditions with the integration
process. Of importance here is the study of the role of immigrant/ethnic
residential concentrations in Canadian cities as these
affect processes of integration of immigrants, as well as the
perceptions of native born and largely European Canadians. The
latter may not recall that earlier waves of immigrants also had
their immigrant concentrations.
There is a need for various sorts of comparative
work. There has been little systematic inter- city comparative
research within Canada. There is also very little systematic
comparative work cited comparing Canadian and other cities. It is
possible that the specific contexts of Canadian cities -- or all
cities -- are so different that there may be few generalizations
which can be drawn which would be useful for policy makers. On
the other hand preliminary observations suggest there may be
common patterns and challenges found in all major cities with
large immigrant populations, in Canada and all immigrant
receiving countries. And finally, there is little work comparing
the same ethnic groups and their experiences in various locales,
e.g. several Canadian cities, several international cities, and
perhaps a homeland control group.
2. Researchers must recognize new evolving paradigms
of the immigration experience. Immigrant integration today is
affected by forces relating to globalization,
including technological change and increased travel which helps
maintain contacts between immigrants, their homeland, and other
diasporic concentrations. The urgency of rapid integration into a
new society may be lessened, while the means for preserving
homeland times are being enhanced. Multiple or diffuse loyalties
may become more prevalent. This is also emerging through the
impact of regionalization, as in the case of the European
Community. Immigrant receiving countries may find themselves
competing globally for the best quality immigrants, or using
immigrant communities as elements in global trade strategies, or
for geo-political influence -- rather than seeing them as
possible threats to national unity or security.
Within this paradigm, researchers should seek to gather data
and analyze processes such as onward or return migration, travel
to and from the homeland, remittance patterns, communications
contacts via telephone or e-mail, and the role of homeland
countries in supporting diasporic communities in Canada. Diaspora
cultures can also be sustained through readily available videos
as well as radio and cable television ethnic programming. These
various networks of contact, with their economic, cultural, and
political implications, deserve sustained study.
3. The approach to immigrant integration should grapple with
the issue of benchmarking. Work to date reflects
the ideological or convenient bias in which the native born
pattern is inevitably assumed as normative. But these norms may
reflect arbitrary impacts of social power, rather than objective
measures of social merit. The consideration of ethnic
concentrations as problematic is an example. Such immigrant
economic enclaves could be seen as sources of innovation. For
some variables, societal outcomes might be enhanced were the
native born to "converge" with immigrant patterns.
4. Research on immigrant integration must recognize that
integration is usually a nested process. Immigrants
often integrate into a family, then neighbourhood, ethnic
subcommunity, ethnic community, and then lastly -- if at all --
into an amorphous Canadian society. This understanding points to
the need to study ethnic communal organizations not only for
their political roles, but as agents of immigrant integration.
Research has neglected organizations such as ethnic churches
which have been and remain important in the process of
integration.
Even more neglected by researchers than ethno-specific
organizations have been mainstream voluntary associations
and organizations which play important roles in the process of
immigrant integration. Often these roles are subtle and indirect.
But their impact is considerable. Mainstream churches, Boy Scouts
and Girl Guides, amateur sports leagues of various sorts, YMCA's
and YWCA's, are examples of organizations in the voluntary sector
with a considerable impact on integration, for both adults and
children alike.
5. The provision of culturally sensitive services
for immigrants remains a challenge that impacts on many policy
domains: health, social services, education, justice, business,
the media, etc. These services play a key role in facilitating
integration. Research is needed on the roles of ethnic origin
professionals, ethno-specific institutions, and culturally
sensitive practice.
In general such research should seek to extend and explore the
role of institutional completeness as either
promoter of or impediment to efficient immigrant integration.
These issues relate to the broader question of what limits
there can and should be to cultural pluralism in
Canada, in the public domain, which in turn will set the
parameters for immigrant integration policies. Legal research
will be central in this effort.
6. Studies of immigrant integration must become more sensitive
to the unique dilemmas faced by immigrant women,
both in access to the labour market and in terms of family
stresses and strains.
In the latter case, research on the nature of any unique
tensions within immigrant families, between
grandparents, parents and children or between spouses may provide
information which can ease the integration process.
7. It is crucial to include research on the second
generation i.e. child immigrants and Canadian born
children of immigrants, in any research agenda. Such research
should focus on educational attainment and occupational outcomes,
as well as on cultural and attitudinal measures. This recognizes
that the process of integration is ultimately a
multi-generational one. In addition, second generation problems
of identity formation, or reactions to discrimination, are often
different from those of immigrants themselves. The inclusion of a
census question on birthplace of parents would be
of immense use in this effort.
8. There are many disciplines with research pertinent to
immigrant integration which were not included in this initial
set; These would bear strongly on the policy domains of interest
to Canadian policy-makers. These include: political
science; social work; health; education; law and criminology
(from the perspective of the workings of the justice system);cultural
studies; business, marketing, and human resources (
as distinct from economics).
As an example, the political integration of
immigrants remains understudied, though subject to opposing
perceptions. Either immigrants are marginal to the system, or
they seem "too involved" and perhaps distort the
political agenda through special interest lobbying or voting.
Similarly, the links between ethnic communal organizations and
mainstream political entities, such as parties or governments,
remains unsystematically studied.
Even more understudied has been the actual housing
conditions as opposed to residential patterns, in which
immigrant live. This could be examined easily with available
census data.
9. The experience of immigrant integration is by definition multi-dimensional,
with interactions over several domains. But most published
research is disciplinary-specific, with cross-disciplinary
publication rare. Often researchers and their studies talk past
each other. A challenge for the field would be to explore ways in
which researchers from different disciplines, and indeed using
different methods, might coordinate or initiate such
collaborative efforts. The urban focus lends itself
superbly to the weakening of disciplinary barriers
to innovative research models. The field of ethnic studies
has emerged as a multi-disciplinary and at times
inter-disciplinary area specialty. Perhaps the field of immigration
studies might evolve either in parallel, or in merged
form with ethnic studies, to reflect a similar multiplicity and
intersection of issues.
10. Very few of the studies cited focus on the impact of categories
of immigrants -- independents, investors, or business
class; family class; refugees -- on integration processes.
Logically these should be important, and they should be included
as explanatory variables. But it is also not clear to what extent
these categories produce meaningful social groupings and
experiences, compared to factors such as region of settlement or
ethno-cultural origin.
Almost no research has explored the very basic premise of
selectivity and the basic classes of immigration which underlie
Canadian policy. Are the benefits of this elaborate system of
selection and categorization worth the additional expenditures?
Alternate models using principles of a lottery system in some
form might well yield comparable outcomes. We just do not know.
11. Many studies speak in general terms about immigration, or
about visible minorities, or about national trends -- where there
is enormous variation in experiences. The major
challenge for integration is generally faced by those groups
which are recent immigrants, visible minorities, and
refugee or family class.
12. There is a need for more qualitative studies
of the texture of urban life, which could then be
linked to more quantitative measures such as indices of
residential concentration. There is a need to study middle
class immigrant\ethnic suburbs as well as
inner city areas of first settlement. The tradition of the
Canadian classic suburban study Crestwood Heights could be
revived.
There is a need to study specifically the urban
political environment and municipal politics, as a
frequent site of conflict or contested terrain between immigrants
and non-migrants. This would require an
"Americanization" of the study of urban ethnic politics
in Canada. This would also include contentious issues like
"white flight" and the political dimensions of school
integration policies. Ethnic/political conflict is more likely in
big cities since minorities generally have a large enough
critical mass to sustain political mobilization.
13. There is a glaring lack of scientific research on many
aspects of the linkage of immigration and crime on
the one hand, and the justice system on the other.
The evidence that exists indicates that immigrants, as a group,
are NOT over-represented among those apprehended or convicted for
criminal acts. Yet this generality masks significant internal
variation.
The existence of systemic bias against minorities along the
various steps of the justice system, from police harassment on
the street through arrest, trial and conviction, sentencing, and
parole, are more asserted than documented with rigorous Canadian
data. These data -- linking crime statistics to
origin or birthplace of perpetrators -- are not collected or
analyzed for most crimes. (Such data are available for the First
Nations population). Though none of the reviews addressed this
issue, it may be timely to explore the possibility of collecting
such information (which has been done routinely in the United
States) to establish what benefits or costs (through misuse)
might accrue.
14. It is generally asserted that Canada's multiculturalism
and immigration policies are somehow linked, but the
nature of that linkage remains to be established. One way to do
that might be through international comparisons. A
"hyphenated" Canadian seems more acceptable than a
hyphenated German, Swede, or Italian. How does this influence
patterns of immigrant admissions and integration?
15. a. A central question which can guide policy- relevant
research is the degree of relevance of the experience of
earlier waves of mass European migration to the likely experience
of contemporary waves of non-European migration.
We know from the demographic evidence that there is generally
convergence on most socio-demographic indicators over time and
generation. Economic gaps tend to narrow, though the process is
slower for the more recent cohorts of immigrants. Immigration
continues to add to urban concentration and to ethnic diversity.
15.b There is still a need for additional research on the demographic
consequences of immigration on variables such as sex
ratios, marital patterns, dependency ratios, and age structure.
Each one of the variables listed is of major social and
demographic importance, with major policy implications, and
deserves in -depth study. These studies should disaggregate the
national data by province and urban centres, since regional
variations may be pronounced.
One problem in utilizing demographic research is the absence
of a population policy within which one can
evaluate immigration processes and other demographic
characteristics, such as the size, composition, and preferred
distribution of the population.
There is also evidence of cultural assimilation with
succeeding generations. These findings derive from
socio-demographic studies of earlier waves of mainly European
immigrants, and their numerous descendants.
Important differences relating to recent immigration may
include greater racism directed at non-Europeans, economic
restructuring and downsizing, increasing communications with home
countries, official multiculturalism, and lower relative
educational and occupational levels among more recent arrivals.
16. There may be a need to broaden the approaches to
researching the economic costs and benefits of immigration.
The consensus seems to be that immigration yields at least a
small but positive benefit overall, and is not a fiscal
liability. Immigrants in general catch up with the native born,
though comparing incomes of immigrants with the native born does
not yield a comprehensive macro-economic picture. It is unclear
how incomes of the native born themselves are impacted by
immigration, or how immigration impacts on unemployment rates of
the native born population.
More work remains to be done on whether economic segmentation
of immigrants in certain niches represents a loss or gain for
immigrants, and for society as a whole. Part of this work should
include a focus on the particular roles played by immigrant
entrepreneurs, and indeed how, if at all, their economic
patterns differ from those of the native born.
If ethnic economic segmentation is found to be negative, how
can policies address that without major interference in labour
markets? It might be difficult to reconcile such findings with
positive income performance, on average. And if ethnic economic
segmentation is found to be counter-productive, what steps can or
should governments take to ameliorate these conditions?
There seems to be little work actually measuring the linkages,
if any, between immigration to Canada and international
trade. The fact that many successful (Asian) trading
countries are not immigration countries does not mean that such a
link might not operate in the Canadian case.
Measurement issues also abound: economic costs are usually up
front, while benefits may include savings in human capital
formation, as well as a longer term and multi-generational stream
of benefits. Immigrants may also be over-represented in unpaid
family business or domestic labour, or among those with
undeclared incomes, all of which understate a net economic
contribution.
It is also important to research the role of post-secondary
students who are foreign born, or children of immigrants, in key
educational (notably graduate and post-graduate) areas in the
sciences, math, and engineering.
17. There is a need for research on the geographic and
occupational mobility of immigrants. This should include
data on the reasons for internal geographic and
occupational moves, and is best obtained by longitudinal surveys.
Few of the reviews have addressed the question of how it might be
possible to attract and retain immigrants to smaller cities and
towns, or to other regions of Canada in which the foreign born
have been under-represented. Given constitutional mobility
rights, it is also not clear whether immigrant dispersion is a
legitimate or feasible goal of public policy. It is not clear
what are the support services for immigrants that are decisive in
such cases, as well as how a critical mass of initial immigrants
can be established as a base for attracting others. But it is
important to compare integration processes in Canada's large
cities with those in smaller cities and towns.
Also, few detailed studies were cited analyzing the forces
which determine the labour market strategies of
immigrants: previous skills, language barriers, devalued
credentials, discrimination, general economic conditions,
specific job opportunities, retraining opportunities, formal
employment searches, informal contacts through family or ethnic
communal contacts, etc. In other words, what is the interplay
between economic and other social forces that determine
these decisions on the part of immigrants?
18. There is need for continuing research on impacts of
immigration on language knowledge and
use in Canada, with this recognized as a human capital
asset. It is important to disaggregate this
research by city or region, since national data alone may mask
the significance of the patterns.
19. Racism in all its manifestations must be elevated to
centre stage in research on immigrant integration. It is
recognized that racist attitudes and actions are a result of a
complex set of factors, some individual and some societal. Yet
little is known about why Canadians hold the racist
( prejudicial, or stereotypical) attitudes they do. Replicated
research with uniform instruments can help. In addition, research
is needed on the more basic issue of Canadian attitudes to
cultural difference and cultural change. It is unclear from the
cited studies whether policies which directly or indirectly
promote either cultural retention or assimilation impact on
tolerance positively or negatively.
In addition, it is not clear whether multiculturalism policy
actually impacts on the lives of immigrants. But it is important
to recognize that multicultural polices in themselves do not
"require" immigrants to do anything vis a vis their
heritage culture.
20. Discrimination can shape the process of immigrant
integration. Research has been conducted on both the determinants
of prejudice and possible impacts on victims. These
studies have used both surveys and laboratory methods. Yet the
findings have not yet been synthesized to yield policy advice on
how to minimize levels of prejudice and also enable immigrants to
cope better with it. The reviews did not include evaluations of
policies or programmes aimed at reducing levels of racial
prejudice (e.g. in schools, or the workplace) or in helping
minorities cope with psychological consequences of
discrimination.
21. So much of the Canadian response to immigration and
integration is a result of perceptions which are shaped by the media.
Most of the available research tends to condemn the mainstream
media for either perpetuating stereotypes or focusing on negative
new stories dealing with immigrants. More scientific research
using a variety of methods is required. In addition, systematic
studies of the ethnic media, particularly as an
agent of socialization and integration, are important.
22. Canada, through its constitution and other federal and
provincial laws, continues to wrestle with a "values
mismatch" between individual and collective models
of citizenship. There may well be no "solution" here.
This legal tension may also feed into pubic perceptions of
immigration, and resulting diversity, as undermining societal
cohesion. In Quebec, the debate is even more complex given the
concern of the French majority for the integration of immigrants
into francophone society.
Related to these issues are questions of the reciprocal impact
of immigrants and the host society on evolving conceptions of
Canadian citizenship, the character of Canadian civil society,
and the nature of Canadian culture. At times there is a public
misconception that these have historically been static, only now
subject to challenge from new waves of immigrants. There was
little research cited that measures the practical ways in which
these theoretical debates impact on the realities of immigrant
integration. But it is important to develop research to enable
Canada to manage this transition with a maximal amount of
civility, efficiency, and fairness.
[Back] [Table of contents] [Forward]